Norwegian killer studied IRA and Bloody Sunday

Mayor of Londonderry Maurice Devenney opened a Book of Condolence to remember the victims of the terror attacks in Norway on Monday.

He said: “This is a terrible time for the people of Norway. They are numb with shock and emotion and are finding it hard to comprehend the reasoning behind this most tragic act of terror.

“The Book of Condolence will provide local people with an opportunity to express their sympathy and offer their support to the victims and their families as they try to come to terms with their loss,” he commented.

Now it emerges the man responsible for the killings studied Northern Ireland, the IRA and Sinn Féin, before carrying out the deadly attacks.

A document entitled ‘2083 A European Declaration of Independence’ signed under “Andrew Berwick, London, 2011” - an apparent Anglicisation of Anders Breivik - attacks what he describes as the “destruction of Western Civilisation” and the “Islamisation of Europe” and suggests right-wing extremists carry out a fourth generation war over the next 70 years to reverse European multiculturalism.

In the 1,500 page document he claims: “There are few examples of the state being effective in a 4GW conflict. The only major example is that of the British Army in Northern Ireland after the events of Bloody Sunday.

“A notable theorist of 4GW, William Lind, believes that the reason for the British being successful in that conflict was that the British Army did not use heavy weapons in that period and that the British Government forces attempted to get to know the areas involved in the conflict.

“Also according to Lind the British did not engage in collective punishment and desired to keep civilian casualties to a minimum. In other words they won over the population by reducing the risk of damage to civilians and their property and by getting to know the local area.”

The confused document elsewhere suggests that right wing terrorists looking for guns could target corrupt IRA members in order to obtain black market weapons.

He suggested the IRA were amongst groups he found “often will not have access to weapons or have them but are unwilling to sell them off....Marxist organizations rarely sell weapons to anybody other than ‘fellow travellers’ in allied Marxist organizations.

“The trick is to find the occasional deserter or corrupt individual in one of these organizations who can be convinced to give something up for cash or something of value,” he states.

Breivik later suggests that: “Just like Irish-Americans assisted the IRA over several years, European-Americans should assist their brothers in Europe. The faith of multiculturalism will be decided in Europe as the front lines of the war between cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists will be fought in major European cities.”

The document describes how the ‘Knights Templar’ should lead a phased European civil war against multiculturalism, Marxism and “Islamisation” involving open source warfare, military shock attacks by clandestine cell systems, coup d’états, the implementation of a cultural conservative agenda, the “execution of cultural Marxist/multiculturalist traitors and the deportation of Muslims”.

He also suggests the creation of a political wing but warns of the danger of the leadership giving in to pressure and granting concessions and uses the example of the republican movement in Northern Ireland.

“The rationale for the overt political-covert military split is to avoid the inflexibility of a completely secret organisation. By splitting, the public issues can be addressed overtly, while military actions remain covert and intelligence functions stay clandestine,” he writes.

“However, even though no direct ties, a political organisation affiliated with a ’terrorist military wing’ will result in various forms of persecution of the individuals involved.

“It will most likely result in the leadership giving in to pressure, bribes and as a result granting concessions (which the military wing disapproves of), as we saw with the IRA case,” he suggests.

Elsewhere, the document blames the EU for making it more difficult for terrorists to make bombs using fertiliser in the wake of the Provos’ use of Ammonium Nitrate from the 1970s onwards.