Letter: DUP have to be challenged on Irish Language Act or future generations will wonder why

Over the past two years, Armagh City, Banbridge & Craigavon Borough Council have been involved in discussions in relation to bi-lingual signage and the council’s legal obligations on such a provision/policy.
'Father Christmas' at Stormont in December 2019, with Irish langauge campaigners'Father Christmas' at Stormont in December 2019, with Irish langauge campaigners
'Father Christmas' at Stormont in December 2019, with Irish langauge campaigners

We had received clear legal advice that we needed to amend and introduce a policy and guidance or face a potential judicial review based on failure to take a decision.

Obviously this issue was being driven by Republicans in their quest to be divisive and waste ratepayer’s money on political stunts.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It was clear during workshop discussions that they wanted to force this through council, following nationalist controlled councils who have 51% threshold (that is, 51% of people in an area must be happy with bi-lingual signage before it can be introduced).

Letter to the editorLetter to the editor
Letter to the editor

We resisted their quest for haste and ensured a proper policy was considered with 66% required by local residents, with every application giving the council discretion to make a final decision on any application.

This agenda is politically driven by Nationalism with firstly no regard for the ratepayer, given the fact that officers outlined approximate costs for this process which could be up to £1,500 per sign; and secondly, one SF councillor Brona Haughey stated publicly that “it’s just the start” which clearly indicates her narrow priorities.

Following this issue being ratified, I cannot help but think of how a stand-alone Irish Language Act (ILA) would be used if the DUP continue to support this SF demand.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The actions and words of SF/SDLP and Alliance on this should be a wake-up call, not just in the ABC and the eight other councils who have amended their policies, but should make us more determined not to gift the ILA to republicans who have weaponised this minority language to try and sanitise our Britishness.

I challenge Arlene Foster to reassess her favour for this ILA and withdraw her support for it; and if she does not, then surely some MP or MLA needs to challenge publicly her leadership on this serious matter.

I would also encourage the Unionist community to continue to challenge the DUP MPs, MLAs, Lords, councillors and members on this issue and make their views clear on the ILA.

The Unionist community need to stand firm on this issue or our future generations will wonder why we never acted to resist an Irish Language Act which will have far reaching consequences for Unionism.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Attention should be on a business recovery plan for the next few years ahead, instead of wasting money on this minority language.

Paul Berry, Independent councillor and ex-DUP MLA, Armagh

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Alistair Bushe

Editor