Peatlands rape charge man '˜tried to strangle himself'

Details emerged as James Wright, of Derrylee Road in Dungannon, mounted an application for bail.

The woman was ambushed and stripped naked as she walked her dog last Wednesday afternoon, April 27.

Crown lawyer Conor Maguire said the victim recalled being grabbed by her shoulders as she walked through the park at around 2.30pm.

She screamed and struggled with the man, but he put a hand over her mouth which stopped her breathing.

The High Court heard she resigned herself to the sexual assault amid fears she would be killed.

Forensic tests are being carried out on a bicycle and high-visibility jacket recovered from Wright’s home.

He declined to provide intimate body samples and refused to take part in an identification process, the court heard.

However, Mr Maguire said the victim picked him out from a photograph as being the man who raped her.

After being assessed by a psychiatrist as fit to be interviewed and charged, Wright would not answer questions put to him.

Opposing bail, the prosecutor argued, “The attacker had no regard for the fact this woman was conducting an innocent activity, and no regard for the fact that passers-by could have come upon the scene.”

Defence counsel countered that a second psychiatrist believes Wright’s limited intelligence meant he was not fit to be interviewed or understand the proceedings.

Raising the issues over his client’s suitability for any potential trial, the barrister said, “He’s got an IQ of 44. I have never personally come across a criminal trial taking place with someone who has an IQ of less than 50.”

He also told the court Wright claimed to have tried to strangle himself on Wednesday night.

Adjourning the bail application, Mr Justice O’Hara requested more information on medical issues and the safety of Wright’s current detention.

He said, “There’s an obligation on this court to take steps to protect the victim - and this lady has been raped, this isn’t an alleged rape - and other members of the public.

“But there’s also an obligation, given the circumstances, the IQ and limitations of Mr Wright, to make sure he’s protected. There isn’t a conflict between those interests.”