McKillop responds to ‘unfounded attacks’

In a statement issued on Monday, Cllr. McKillop said: “The attempts by some to tarnish my name by labelling my motion of last week sectarian and likening it to apartheid is a gross distortion which bears no relation to the facts of the situation.

“Those who know me before I entered council know that I have good relationships with people throughout the area from both Roman Catholic and Protestant communities.

“In my duties as a councillor I will continue to represent the interests of any ratepayer who comes to me for assistance regardless of their perceived background.”

Cllr McKillop said her motion was far from sectarian rather it was a mature and sensible proposal to prevent what she alleged was a deterioration in community relations .

“There have been three events where councillor McShane’s presence has created community tension and led to adverse publicity with a demonstration featured in a TV report and a cost to the public purse in excess of £2,000 in policing the situation.

“Add to that the cost to the area generated by the adverse publicity and I believe that ratepayers are being poorly served.

“People have a right to exercise their civil and religious liberties in a responsible manner – just as the Orangemen did during their parade at Ballycastle.

“A t-shirt upholding the right to march would not be considered offensive by any reasonable person, ” Councillor McKillop added.

At the time of the debate, Cllr. McShane said he was delighted that all councillors rejected the motion from the TUV.

“I remain committed to the entire district,” Cllr. McShane added.